LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

pro omni alio onere

Read a random definition: quasi-tenant

A quick definition of pro omni alio onere:

Term: pro omni alio onere

Definition: Pro omni alio onere is a phrase used in old legal documents. It means "for every other burden." This phrase was often used in a charter clause to limit the duties of a vassal to only those that were specifically named in the charter.

A more thorough explanation:

pro omni alio onere

Pro omni alio onere is a legal term that means "for every other burden." It refers to a clause in a charter that limits a vassal's duties to only those that are specifically listed in the charter. This means that the vassal is not responsible for any other obligations or duties that are not explicitly stated in the charter.

For example, if a vassal's charter states that they are responsible for providing military service and paying taxes, but does not mention anything about providing food or shelter for the lord, then the vassal is not obligated to provide those things. Pro omni alio onere ensures that the vassal is only responsible for what is explicitly stated in the charter and not burdened with any additional duties.

proof of will | pro opere et labore

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 1 👎

Fruityfruitbat

17:07

how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

17:07

@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu

jackfrost11770

17:08

FUCK THE NYPD

SplitterusClitterus

17:08

WASP HAHAHAHAHHA

texaslawhopefully

17:08

Estimates are about 4k fruitbat

YRDSL

17:08

im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them

Fruityfruitbat

17:08

woof

texaslawhopefully

17:08

I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though

llama

17:08

@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite

Fruityfruitbat

17:09

get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol

Dkk

17:09

@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

17:09

i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris

texaslawhopefully

17:10

Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.

HopefullyInLawSchool

17:10

i am a voter so i voted

BigStrongBug

17:11

Lol what does gender relations mean

BigStrongBug

17:11

Like are you anti gay marriage?

texaslawhopefully

17:11

@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?

Fruityfruitbat

17:11

blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.

BigStrongBug

17:11

Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too

texaslawhopefully

17:12

Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo

SplitterusClitterus

17:12

I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

17:12

this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick

llama

17:12

@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal

Fruityfruitbat

17:13

facts knowledgeable

SplitterusClitterus

17:13

Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms

HopefullyInLawSchool

17:13

@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year

llama

17:15

yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain

HopefullyInLawSchool

17:15

I dont think so based on my very brief research

llama

17:16

hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?

Dkk

17:17

@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.