Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Promissory estoppel

Read a random definition: fine for endowment

A quick definition of Promissory estoppel:

Promissory estoppel is a legal rule that says if someone makes a promise and another person relies on that promise, the person who made the promise can be held responsible for any harm caused by breaking the promise. This means that even if there was no formal contract, the person who made the promise can still be held accountable for not keeping their word if the other person relied on it. If someone breaks a promise made through promissory estoppel, they may have to pay damages to the other person.

A more thorough explanation:

Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine that allows a party to recover damages based on a promise made when the party relied on that promise and the reliance was reasonable. This means that if someone makes a promise to you and you rely on that promise, they may be legally obligated to fulfill that promise even if there was no formal contract.

The Supreme Court has recognized promissory estoppel as a "state law doctrine creating legal obligations never explicitly assumed by the parties that are enforceable." This means that even if there was no formal contract, a promise made under promissory estoppel can still be legally binding.

If someone breaches an obligation created by promissory estoppel, a court can choose to assign either reliance damages or expectation damages. Reliance damages compensate the party for any losses they suffered as a result of relying on the promise, while expectation damages compensate the party for what they would have received if the promise had been fulfilled.

For example, let's say that a company promises to give an employee a raise if they complete a certain project. The employee works hard and completes the project, but the company does not give them the promised raise. The employee could potentially sue the company for breach of promissory estoppel and recover damages for the lost raise.

Promisor | Promissory note

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.