Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

propter defectum

Read a random definition: subdivision exaction

A quick definition of propter defectum:

Propter defectum is a legal term that means a challenge based on the claim that a potential juror is not qualified to serve on any jury due to a reason such as being too young, not being a resident, or not being a citizen. It is one of several types of challenges that can be made during the jury selection process. Challenges are formal objections to the legality or qualifications of a person, action, or thing, and they are used to ensure that a fair and impartial jury is selected for a trial.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Propter defectum is a type of challenge in which a potential juror is claimed to be incompetent to serve on any jury due to a reason such as alienage, infancy, or nonresidency.

Example: During jury selection, the defense attorney made a propter defectum challenge against a potential juror who was not a resident of the state, claiming that they were not qualified to serve on any jury.

Explanation: In this example, the defense attorney is using a propter defectum challenge to argue that the potential juror is not qualified to serve on any jury due to their nonresidency. This type of challenge is based on a claim that the juror is incompetent to serve on any jury for a specific reason, and is different from other types of challenges that may be made during jury selection.

propter curam et culturam | propter defectum sanguinis

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.