Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

propter delectum personae

Read a random definition: terminus a quo

A quick definition of propter delectum personae:

Term: PROPTER DELECTUM PERSONAE

Definition: Propter delectum personae is a Latin term used in law which means "on account of the selection of persons." This means that if someone has been specifically chosen to perform certain duties, they cannot delegate those duties to someone else. For example, if someone is chosen for a job that requires specific skills, they cannot pass those duties onto someone else who does not have those skills.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Propter delectum personae is a Latin legal term that means "on account of the selection of persons." This term is used to describe a situation where a person cannot delegate the principal duties of an office when they have been specifically chosen to perform those duties.

Example: For instance, if a company hires a CEO to run the company, the CEO cannot delegate their responsibilities to someone else. This is because the company chose the CEO specifically for their skills and experience, and they are expected to fulfill their duties personally.

Explanation: The example illustrates the concept of propter delectum personae because the CEO was chosen for their specific skills and experience, and they are expected to personally fulfill their duties. This means that they cannot delegate their responsibilities to someone else, as it would go against the reason they were chosen for the position in the first place.

propter defectum sanguinis | propter delictum

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.