Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

proxy statement

Read a random definition: Kleindienst v. Mandel

A quick definition of proxy statement:

A proxy statement is a document that a company gives to its shareholders before a meeting. It tells them what they will be voting on, like choosing new leaders or deciding on important business deals. The government makes sure companies follow rules when they make these statements.

A more thorough explanation:

A proxy statement is a document that public companies have to give to their shareholders before a shareholder meeting. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) makes companies follow Schedule 14A when they file their proxy statement. Companies use a Form DEF 14A to file their proxy statements. Proxy statements explain proposals that shareholders will vote on, like electing new directors, deciding on executive compensation plans, and voting on important transactions.

Let's say you own some shares in a company. The company wants to make some big changes, like hiring new executives or merging with another company. Before they can do that, they have to get approval from their shareholders. They'll send you a proxy statement that explains what they want to do and asks for your vote. You can vote in person at the shareholder meeting or by filling out a proxy card and sending it back to the company.

Another example could be a company proposing a new policy that would affect the environment. The proxy statement would explain the policy and ask shareholders to vote on whether or not to approve it.

These examples show how a proxy statement is a way for companies to communicate with their shareholders and get their input on important decisions.

proxy | prudence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.