Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

public controversy

Read a random definition: admittendo in socium

A quick definition of public controversy:

Public controversy refers to a disagreement or dispute that is debated publicly and has significant consequences for people other than those involved. It can lead to legal disputes, and those who participate in it may be considered public figures. Separable controversy is a claim that is separate from other claims in a lawsuit, while an actual controversy is a case that requires a definitive determination of the law on the facts alleged for the adjudication of an actual dispute. In simpler terms, public controversy is a big argument that lots of people know about, and it can cause legal problems. Separable controversy is a separate issue in a legal case, and actual controversy is a real problem that needs to be solved in court.

A more thorough explanation:

Public controversy refers to a disagreement or dispute that is debated publicly and has significant consequences for people other than those involved in the dispute. It can involve issues such as politics, social justice, or public policy.

For example, a public controversy could be a debate over whether a particular law should be passed or repealed. This type of controversy can involve many people and can have a significant impact on society as a whole.

Participants in a public controversy may be considered public figures, which means they are subject to greater scrutiny and criticism than private individuals. This is especially true if they are involved in the controversy voluntarily, have access to channels of communication to counter false statements, and play a prominent role in the controversy.

Separable controversy is a claim that is separate and independent from other claims being made in a lawsuit. This type of controversy is often associated with a statute that allows an entire case to be removed to federal court if one of the claims presents a federal question that falls under the jurisdiction of the federal courts.

Another type of controversy is an actual controversy, which is a case that requires a definitive determination of the law on the facts alleged for the adjudication of an actual dispute, and not merely a hypothetical, theoretical, or speculative legal issue. This type of controversy must be a real and substantial controversy that admits of specific relief through a conclusive decree, as distinguished from an opinion advising what the law would be upon a hypothetical state of facts.

Public Contracts Act | public-convenience-and-necessity standard

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.