Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

public-duty doctrine

Read a random definition: parajudge

A quick definition of public-duty doctrine:

The public-duty doctrine is a rule that says a government organization, like a city or state, cannot be held responsible if someone gets hurt because a government worker didn't do their job properly. This is because the worker's duty is to the general public, not to any one person in particular. This rule is also called the public-duty rule and is different from the special-duty doctrine.

A more thorough explanation:

The public-duty doctrine is a legal principle that states that a government entity, such as a state or municipality, cannot be held responsible for an individual's injury resulting from a breach of duty by a government officer or employee. This duty is owed to the general public rather than to the individual plaintiff.

For example, if a police officer fails to respond to a specific individual's call for help, the individual cannot sue the police department for damages resulting from the officer's failure to act. This is because the officer's duty is to the general public, not to any specific individual.

Another example is if a city fails to maintain a sidewalk, causing someone to trip and fall. The individual cannot sue the city for damages because the city's duty is to the general public to maintain the sidewalks, not to any specific individual.

The public-duty doctrine is important because it protects government entities from being held liable for every individual's injury resulting from the actions of their officers or employees. It ensures that government entities can focus on serving the general public without fear of being sued for every individual's injury.

public debt | public enemy

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.