Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

pure trademark

Read a random definition: status offender

A quick definition of pure trademark:

A pure trademark is a special word, picture, or symbol that a company uses to show that their product is different from others. It's like a signature for their product. To be protected by the law, the trademark must be unique, put on products that are sold, and registered with the government. If someone else uses the same trademark, the owner can take legal action. There are different types of trademarks, like ones that describe the product or ones that are made up words. A trademark is important because it helps people know which product they are buying and who made it.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A pure trademark is a word, phrase, logo, or symbol used by a manufacturer or seller to distinguish its product or products from those of others. The main purpose of a trademark is to designate the source of goods or services. To receive federal protection, a trademark must be distinctive, affixed to a product that is actually sold in the marketplace, and registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Unregistered trademarks are protected under common-law only, and distinguished with the mark “TM.”

Example: Nike's "swoosh" logo is a pure trademark that distinguishes its products from those of other athletic apparel companies. The logo is distinctive and registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, giving Nike legal protection against others using a similar logo to sell their products.

Explanation: The example illustrates how a pure trademark, in this case, Nike's "swoosh" logo, is used to distinguish a company's products from those of its competitors. The logo is distinctive and registered, giving Nike legal protection against others using a similar logo to sell their products.

pure theory | pure villeinage

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11ama
20:08
Indeed.
damn how are you guys calculating all these numbers lmao
i'm guessing maybe around 30ish more As then?
if we're being generous
11ama
20:27
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: Mostly using https://www.lsd.law/download and the 509 repots
11ama
20:28
reeeeeeports*
fml i'm a november applicant that still hasn't heard back
do we know if there are date changes for Rs too? for umich
how come i haven’t heard from some schools w high acceptance rates? what are they up to? like nebraska hasn’t been releasing decisions
is washu done sending out decisions? they just completely ghosted me
11ama
20:33
@SuperficialBlueWeasel: The reality is you are likely behind a gaggle of Sept-Oct. applicants. THe schools are backed up with apps. Some are fast, others are really slow. Also some schools may have had adcoms retire/ shortage of cannonfadder app readers. Try to chill out/research the schools you have applied to so when you get an answer you can move quick and lock up a deal/
thanks @11ama
11ama
20:34
In the event you have not received an admissions decision yet, have you tried turning your computer on and off, have you tried checking your span, and have you ensured your email inbox is not full?
OlDirtyBtard
20:34
I used to come on here and troll people and now I got my first R's and I no longer have a sense of humor
11ama
20:36
I was interested in applying to 'Bama law. Called them up, asked if they had any distant cousins attending their institution based on family name/ Ancestry.con DNA. They did not. I replied I was regrettably no longer interested in their institution.
Are you sure you ever did
OlDirtyBtard
20:36
all i'm saying is, i would debase myself to dean cooper for a cornell A
11ama
20:37
@OlDirtyBtard: Being an asshole is not sufficient for being funny, Unc.
11ama
20:37
Trust me, I tried it many a times b4/
20:39
I wonder if schools are punishing R&R's with no increases to GPA or LSAT.
20:40
Or no new work experience.
20:40
Last cycle people who are too burnt to go get something impressive to add to their resume and application.
11ama
21:00
@JuicyApple: Oh no doubt. Wouldn't you be perturbed if you rejected someone and they came back next year with a 'hey boo, its me again' ?
fedclerkhopeful
21:02
Yeah that’s def a real fear. I think too it puts people who have high stats but are going to reapply in a weird place because you can’t even improve the most important parts of your app
11ama
21:03
I'm sure it falls in the same category as retaking the LSAT: one more thing to be held against you.
21:05
Alrighty then. Sounds bad.
OlDirtyBtard
21:06
nah tbh just reapp to make them say no
OlDirtyBtard
21:06
advance out of spite alone
11ama
21:17
Pretty crazy sheer number of applicants, IMO. I hope people find fulfilling work, yet I fear the future will not reveal said state of affairs since movies/culture makes law seem much more bad ass than it is.
11ama
21:18
Law = paper pusher maxxing, prove me wrong;
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.