Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Putative Spouse Doctrine

Read a random definition: Malleus Maleficarum

A quick definition of Putative Spouse Doctrine:

The putative spouse doctrine is a rule that helps protect someone who marries someone they believe is single, but who is actually already married. This person is called the "putative spouse." In places that follow this rule, the putative spouse can still have rights to property and money, even though the marriage is not valid. This means that both the legal spouse and the putative spouse can share these things.

A more thorough explanation:

The putative spouse doctrine is a legal concept that aims to protect the financial and property interests of a person who enters into a marriage in good faith, believing it to be valid. This person is referred to as the "putative spouse."

For example, if John marries Jane, but it turns out that Jane was already married to someone else, John is considered a putative spouse. He entered into the marriage in good faith, believing that Jane was free to marry him.

In jurisdictions that recognize the putative spouse doctrine, the putative spouse is entitled to marital property rights along with the legal spouse. This means that both spouses will share the property rights.

For instance, if John and Jane bought a house together during their marriage, both John and Jane's legal spouse would have a claim to the property.

The putative spouse doctrine is designed to protect individuals who unknowingly enter into a bigamous marriage. It ensures that they are not left without any legal rights or financial protection.

Putative | pyramid scheme

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.