Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quasi-suspect classification

Read a random definition: entire

A quick definition of quasi-suspect classification:

Quasi-suspect classification is a legal term that means treating people differently based on their gender or whether they were born in or out of wedlock. This type of classification is not as bad as treating people differently based on their race or nationality, but it still needs to be looked at carefully to make sure it's fair. For example, a law that only allows women to receive alimony might be considered a quasi-suspect classification.

A more thorough explanation:

Quasi-Suspect Classification

Quasi-suspect classification is a legal term used in constitutional law to describe a classification based on gender or legitimacy. This classification is subject to intermediate scrutiny under equal-protection analysis. For example, laws that permit alimony for women only or provide for an all-male draft are examples of quasi-suspect classification.

Quasi-suspect classification is different from suspect classification, which is a statutory classification based on race, national origin, or alienage. Suspect classification is subject to strict scrutiny under equal-protection analysis. Examples of laws creating suspect classifications are those that permit only U.S. citizens to receive welfare benefits and set quotas for the government's hiring of minority contractors.

The difference between the two classifications is that suspect classification is considered more severe and is subject to stricter scrutiny than quasi-suspect classification.

  • A law that permits alimony for women only is an example of quasi-suspect classification.
  • A law that provides for an all-male draft is another example of quasi-suspect classification.

These examples illustrate how quasi-suspect classification is based on gender or legitimacy and is subject to intermediate scrutiny under equal-protection analysis. The laws that permit alimony for women only and provide for an all-male draft are subject to intermediate scrutiny because they treat men and women differently. The government must show that there is an important government interest in treating men and women differently and that the law is substantially related to that interest.

quasi-seisin | quasi-tenant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.