Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quia succedunt in universum jus quod defunctus habuit

Read a random definition: negotiable order of withdrawal

A quick definition of quia succedunt in universum jus quod defunctus habuit:

Term: Quia succedunt in universum jus quod defunctus habuit

Definition: This Latin phrase means that when someone dies, their heirs inherit all of their rights. This applies to both Roman and Scots law. Essentially, the heirs take over everything that the deceased person had, including property, money, and other possessions. This phrase is often used when talking about the legal position of heirs-at-law.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Quia succedunt in universum jus quod defunctus habuit is a Latin phrase used in Roman and Scots law. It means that heirs-at-law succeed to every right that the decedent had.

Example: If a person dies and leaves behind a will, their heirs-at-law will inherit any property or assets that were not specifically mentioned in the will. This is because they succeed to every right that the decedent had.

Explanation: The example illustrates the definition by showing that heirs-at-law have the right to inherit any property or assets that the decedent had, even if they were not mentioned in the will. This is because the heirs-at-law succeed to every right that the decedent had, including the right to inherit property and assets.

quia ita lex scripta est | quia surrogatum sapit naturam surrogati

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
16:22
The reason why today’s Image-Fiction isn’t the rescue from a passive, addictive TV-psychology that it tries so hard to be is that most Image-Fiction writers render their material with the same tone of irony and self-consciousness that their ancestors, the literary insurgents of Beat and postmodernism, used so effectively to rebel against their own world and context. And the reason why this irreverent postmodern approach fails to help the new Imagists transfigure TV is simply that TV has beaten the new Imagists to the punch.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.