Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quia-timet injunction

Read a random definition: Pregnancy Discrimination Act

A quick definition of quia-timet injunction:

A quia-timet injunction is a court order that prevents someone from doing something that they have threatened to do, even if they haven't done it yet. This type of injunction is granted when there is a fear that irreparable harm will occur if the action is taken. It is a type of preventive injunction that aims to stop harm before it happens.

A more thorough explanation:

A quia-timet injunction is a type of court order that is granted to prevent an action that has been threatened but has not yet occurred. The term "quia-timet" comes from the Latin phrase meaning "because he fears."

For example, if a company believes that a competitor is planning to release a product that infringes on their patent, they may seek a quia-timet injunction to prevent the release of the product before it happens. This type of injunction is often used in cases where there is a risk of irreparable harm if the action is allowed to occur.

Another example of a quia-timet injunction is in cases of harassment or stalking. If someone has threatened to harm another person, the victim may seek a quia-timet injunction to prevent the person from carrying out the threat.

Overall, a quia-timet injunction is a powerful tool that can be used to prevent harm before it occurs. It is often granted in cases where there is a significant risk of irreparable harm if the action is allowed to happen.

quia timet | quibus deficientibus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:14
KJD 🗑️ squad
Maybe a fulbright alone isnt insanity, but pairing it with several first author pubs is sick
13:15
Besides lion ur killin jt
texaslawhopefully
13:15
yeah half tuition at CLS is fantastic
Thank you! But lowkey my page a lil fake. Withdrew from UChi after missing the II and the fact my future wife wants to leave the midwest anyways (i cant lie its mainly the first reason tho)
13:16
UChi didn’t inv u but you hit cls w half
13:16
That’s crazy haha
Honestly no clue. I missed NU waves too. Quite frankly, I think my why chicago statements were very meh
My PS and DS were sort of emotion but ended on a happy note. My why chi’s also did a little emotional stuff and I think it might’ve hurt me a bit. No clue tho🤷🏽‍♂️
Trismegistus
13:17
im pubbed in a bar association does that not mean anything wtfffff :(
13:18
@ImpartialLion: water under the bridge for you now tbh 🔥
13:18
Wonder what HLS is doing w our apps tho
texaslawhopefully
13:18
at least you're wondering lol
texaslawhopefully
13:18
I had the II and then got R'd
lilypadfrog
13:19
guys am I part of this conversation i also have a good lsat and no acceptances. I want to feel included
Trismegistus
13:19
my own alma mater straight up ignoring me too
13:19
@lilypadfrog: ur not a kjd without work experience. Back off
I think I’m headed for the HLS WL. I heard that if you get off the WL, you put down your deposit before you hear your offer? Idk how i feel ab that
13:19
*
Every thursday, i still pretend like I have a chance at a II tho
13:20
Yeh my friend got it 5/15 last year… crazy late
13:20
Same same maybe tomorrow 😭
lilypadfrog
13:20
@sadpadresfan: :(
texaslawhopefully
13:21
that's a good thing 😭
texaslawhopefully
13:21
you have actual work experience
Trismegistus
13:21
i was on HLS WL and waited all summer :(
atwatodbit
13:21
i cannot imagine taking HLS at sticker with a good scholly elsewhere. i am trying to just pretend they dont exist tbh
Trismegistus
13:21
got a II and everything
If I didnt get into UVA in November my mental health would be decimated
13:22
@Trismegistus: can I ask where u attend now?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.