Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc

Read a random definition: manufacturing cost

A quick definition of quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc:

Term: QUOD CLERICI NON ELIGANTUR IN OFFICIO BALLIVI, ETC

Definition: This is a legal term that means "clerks cannot be chosen as bailiffs or other officers." In the past, there was a writ that allowed a clerk to be exempt from serving in these positions.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc. is a Latin term used in law which means that clerks are not chosen for the position of a bailiff, beadle, reeve, or any other officer. It refers to a writ that exempts a clerk from serving in such an office.

Example: If a clerk is appointed as a bailiff, they can use the writ of Quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc. to be exempted from serving in that position. This writ was commonly used in medieval times when clerks were often exempted from certain duties due to their religious status.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the writ of Quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc. was used to exempt clerks from serving in certain positions. It shows that this writ was an important legal tool in medieval times and was used to protect the rights of clerks who were often exempted from certain duties due to their religious status.

quod billa cassetur | quod computet

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.