Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc

Read a random definition: joint welfare fund

A quick definition of quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc:

Term: QUOD CLERICI NON ELIGANTUR IN OFFICIO BALLIVI, ETC

Definition: This is a legal term that means "clerks cannot be chosen as bailiffs or other officers." In the past, there was a writ that allowed a clerk to be exempt from serving in these positions.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc. is a Latin term used in law which means that clerks are not chosen for the position of a bailiff, beadle, reeve, or any other officer. It refers to a writ that exempts a clerk from serving in such an office.

Example: If a clerk is appointed as a bailiff, they can use the writ of Quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc. to be exempted from serving in that position. This writ was commonly used in medieval times when clerks were often exempted from certain duties due to their religious status.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the writ of Quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc. was used to exempt clerks from serving in certain positions. It shows that this writ was an important legal tool in medieval times and was used to protect the rights of clerks who were often exempted from certain duties due to their religious status.

quod billa cassetur | quod computet

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Irvine is being snobby and wont start any review until end of Nov.
Yeah, it’s tough. I’m distracting myself by playing good video games after work :)
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:34
I mean if Fordham doesn't release today I will purposefully get on a train, go to new york, and then take the stinkiest shit inside the admission office's toilet (potentially clogging it and forcing them to get a plumber)
IS IT ONLY ON MY END WHY DID THAT SEND TEN MILLION TIMES
HELLO
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
it sent a million times lol
WHAT HAPPENED
yeah i thought you were tweaking for a second
i'm so sorry everyone what the actual fuck this website hates me
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
Jack's just tweaking on LSD no biggie
to be fair this accurately represents my mental state
election day psychosis coming in hot (fordham)
usc pls pull through .....
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.