Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quod partes replacitent

Read a random definition: recusant

A quick definition of quod partes replacitent:

Term: quod partes replacitent

Definition: Quod partes replacitent is a legal term that means "that the parties do replead." It was used historically when a court was unable to determine which party should receive a judgment due to an issue being so insignificant that it was unclear who was in the right. In these cases, the court would order the parties to reconstruct their pleadings in order to clarify the issue and determine a fair outcome.

A more thorough explanation:

quod partes replacitent

Quod partes replacitent is a legal term that means "that the parties do replead." It refers to a judgment given by a court when an issue is formed on such an unimportant point that the court cannot decide who should win the case. In this situation, the court orders the parties to replead their case so that the issue can be resolved.

For example, if two people are in a legal dispute over a small amount of money, and the court cannot determine who is right based on the evidence presented, the court may order quod partes replacitent. This means that the parties must go back and replead their case, providing more evidence or clarifying their arguments so that the court can make a decision.

Another example might be a case where the parties have made contradictory claims, but the court cannot determine which claim is true based on the evidence presented. In this situation, the court may order quod partes replacitent, giving the parties a chance to replead their case and provide more evidence to support their claims.

quod nota | quod partitio fiat

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.