Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quod permittat prosternere

Read a random definition: extra quattuor maria

A quick definition of quod permittat prosternere:

Term: quod permittat prosternere

Definition: Quod permittat prosternere was a legal writ used to abate a nuisance. It was similar to a petition of right and commanded the defendant to allow the plaintiff to remove the nuisance. If the defendant did not comply, they would be summoned to court to explain why. This writ was abolished in 1833 by the Real Property Limitation Act. Essentially, it was a way for someone to legally remove something that was causing harm or annoyance to them or their property.

A more thorough explanation:

Term: Quod permittat prosternere
Definition: Quod permittat prosternere is a legal term that refers to a writ used to abate a nuisance. It is similar to a petition of right. This writ was abolished by the Real Property Limitation Act of 1833. Example: If someone builds a fence that blocks your driveway, you can use quod permittat prosternere to force them to remove the fence. The writ commands the defendant to allow the plaintiff to abate the nuisance. If the defendant does not comply, they will be summoned to appear in court and explain why they will not. The plaintiff can then obtain a judgment to abate the nuisance and recover damages against the defendant. This legal term is not commonly used today, but it was an important tool for property owners in the past. It allowed them to protect their property rights and seek justice when someone else's actions caused a nuisance.

quod permittat | quod recuperet

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.