Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Ratio decidendi

Read a random definition: holder for value

A quick definition of Ratio decidendi:

Ratio decidendi: The reason why a judge made a decision in a court case. It's like the main idea or important point that helped the judge decide what to do. When other cases are similar, judges look at the ratio decidendi from past cases to help them make their decision.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Ratio decidendi is a Latin term that means "rationale for the decision." It refers to the key factual point or chain of reasoning in a case that drives the final judgment. When courts use earlier cases as precedent, they often ask parties to be very clear about how they interpret the main guiding principle or ratio decidendi of the earlier case.

Example: In the case of R v. Dudley and Stephens, the defendants were charged with murder after killing and eating a cabin boy while stranded at sea. The court found them guilty but reduced their sentence to six months in prison. The ratio decidendi of the case was that necessity is not a defense to murder. This means that even if someone feels they had no other choice but to commit a crime, they can still be held responsible for their actions.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the ratio decidendi is the key principle that guides the court's decision. In this case, the court found that even though the defendants were stranded at sea and felt they had no other choice but to kill and eat the cabin boy, they were still guilty of murder. The ratio decidendi of the case was that necessity is not a defense to murder, which means that even if someone feels they had no other choice but to commit a crime, they can still be held responsible for their actions.

ratify | Rational Basis Test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.