Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

reformation

Read a random definition: intangible trade value

A quick definition of reformation:

Reformation: Reformation is when a court changes a contract to make it fair for both parties. This happens when there was a mistake in the contract that needs to be fixed. To do this, the court needs to see proof that there was an agreement before, that there was a mistake made, and that the person asking for the change didn't do anything wrong. For example, if a contract said one thing but both parties meant something else, the court can change it to match what they really meant.

A more thorough explanation:

Reformation is a legal term that refers to a court's power to change a contract to reflect what the parties originally intended. This happens when there is an error in the contract that needs to be corrected. In order for a court to grant reformation, certain requirements must be met.

For example, in the case of Central Oregon Independent Health Services, Inc. v. State, the plaintiff argued that a previous contract required the parties to "pay at the correctly calculated rates." However, the current contract did not include this requirement. The court granted reformation because the plaintiff was able to prove that there was an antecedent agreement, a mistake had been made, and the plaintiff was not guilty of gross negligence.

In order to prove reformation, the following elements must be shown:

  1. There was an antecedent agreement to which the contract can be reformed.
  2. There was a mutual mistake or a unilateral mistake on the part of the party seeking reformation and inequitable conduct on the part of the other party.
  3. The party seeking reformation was not guilty of gross negligence.

Overall, reformation is a way for courts to correct mistakes in contracts and ensure that the parties' intentions are accurately reflected.

referendum | refresh one's recollection

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.