Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Regulation S-K

Read a random definition: mischarge

A quick definition of Regulation S-K:

Regulation S-K is a rule made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that tells companies how to describe important things about their business in documents they file with the SEC. This includes things like how the company started, where it has property, any legal problems it has, and how it makes money. The rule also requires companies to disclose information about their securities, like stock prices and dividends, and to provide financial information like sales and income. The rule also requires companies to disclose information about their management and any people who own a lot of the company's stock. Recently, the SEC changed the rule to give companies more flexibility in deciding what information to disclose, but they still have to tell investors about important things that could affect the company's future.

A more thorough explanation:

Regulation S-K is a rule created by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that requires companies to disclose important information about their business in registration statements, periodic reports, and other filings. This rule outlines how companies should disclose qualitative information about their business, while Regulation S-X outlines how companies should disclose quantitative information, such as financial statements.

Regulation S-K applies to a wide range of filings, including registration statements for initial public offerings (IPOs), periodic reports, tender offers, and proxy statements. It is most commonly used when drafting a Form S-1, Form 10-K, or Form 8-K.

Regulation S-K is divided into different topics and items, each requiring the company to disclose a description of a different material aspect of their operations. Some of the important provisions include:

  • Business: Companies must describe the general development of their business, the location and general character of their property, and any ongoing material legal proceedings.
  • Securities of the Registrant: Companies must disclose information about their securities, such as market price and dividends.
  • Financial Information: Companies must present select financial data for the last five fiscal years, provide management's discussion and analysis (MD&A) of financial condition and results of operation, and discuss internal controls and procedures to ensure the integrity of financial reporting.
  • Management and Certain Security Holders: Companies must disclose information about their directors, executive officers, and control persons, as well as executive compensation and any ownership of or transacting in the company's securities by these individuals. They must also disclose certain corporate governance matters, such as director independence and the composition of committees.
  • Registration Statement and Prospectus Provisions: Companies must summarize the prospectus and describe how they plan to use and distribute the proceeds of an offering, if applicable, how they determined the offering price, whether the offering will dilute existing shares, and whether existing security-holders are selling their security in the offerings.

In November 2020, the SEC amended Regulation S-K to shift to a principles-based disclosure regime, allowing companies greater discretion in determining which developments meet the materiality threshold and therefore must be disclosed. The amendments also require companies to describe their human capital resources, describe regulatory compliance with all material government regulations, and disclose material changes to a previously disclosed business strategy. The amendments eliminated the five-year and three-year disclosure timeframes, instead requiring companies to focus on materiality.

When a company files a Form S-1 to go public, they must comply with Regulation S-K by providing information about their business, securities, financial information, management, and registration statement and prospectus provisions. For example, they must describe the general development of their business, provide select financial data for the last five fiscal years, and disclose information about their directors and executive officers.

Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD) | Regulation S-X

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.