Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Reliance damages

Read a random definition: cessio fori

A quick definition of Reliance damages:

Reliance damages: Money given to someone who lost something because they believed a promise that was broken. The money is meant to help them get back to the same place they were before they believed the promise. This can happen when someone breaks a contract or makes a promise that they don't keep.

A more thorough explanation:

Reliance damages are a type of compensation awarded to a party who has suffered losses due to reasonable reliance on a promise. This means that if someone makes a promise to another person and the other person relies on that promise, but the promise is broken, the injured party may be entitled to reliance damages.

For example, if a company promises to deliver a product to a customer by a certain date, and the customer relies on that promise by making plans around the delivery date, but the company fails to deliver on time, the customer may be entitled to reliance damages. These damages would be calculated based on what it would take to restore the customer to the economic position they were in before they relied on the promise.

Another example of reliance damages could be in a situation where an employer promises an employee a certain salary or benefits package, and the employee relies on that promise by accepting the job and making financial decisions based on the promised salary or benefits. If the employer later reneges on the promise, the employee may be entitled to reliance damages.

Overall, reliance damages are meant to compensate a party for losses suffered as a result of reasonable reliance on a promise that was ultimately broken.

reliance | reliction

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.