Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

representation, estoppel by

Read a random definition: repurchase agreement

A quick definition of representation, estoppel by:

Representation, estoppel by, is a legal concept that prevents someone from making a claim or denying a fact that contradicts what they have previously said or done. It can also prevent the relitigation of issues and be used as a defense alleging good-faith reliance on a misleading representation. There are different types of estoppel, including equitable estoppel, estoppel by deed, and promissory estoppel. The doctrine of estoppel is flexible and can be applied in various situations, such as patents and contracts.

A more thorough explanation:

Representation, estoppel by is a legal concept that prevents someone from making a claim or assertion that contradicts what they have previously said or done, or what has been established as true by law. It can also prevent the relitigation of issues. There are different types of estoppel, including:

  • Equitable estoppel: This prevents someone from taking unfair advantage of another person by inducing them to act in a certain way through false language or conduct. For example, if a landlord promises to fix a leaky roof but fails to do so, the tenant may be able to claim equitable estoppel if they relied on that promise and suffered harm as a result.
  • Estoppel by deed: This prevents a party to a deed from denying anything recited in that deed if they induced another to accept or act under the deed. For example, if a seller of a property signs a warranty deed stating that they have title to the property, they cannot later deny that they had title at the time of the transfer.
  • Promissory estoppel: This allows a promise made without consideration to be enforced if the promisor should have reasonably expected the promisee to rely on the promise and if the promisee did actually rely on the promise to their detriment. For example, if an employer promises an employee a bonus for meeting certain performance goals, the employee may be able to claim promissory estoppel if they met the goals but did not receive the bonus.

These examples illustrate how estoppel can be used to prevent someone from going back on their word or taking advantage of another person's reliance on their actions or statements.

repository | representation election

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:44
Yeah, I would have definitely gone to the hotel if I knew they booked a room for me. At the very least, it would be proper to show up personally and explain your extraneous circumstances
Law-Shark
16:44
Nah but it's in your name. I went to an ASD. I asked the school for an extra night and they gave it to me. You just need to plan things better.
Law-Shark
16:45
This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain.
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
Does anyone have experience getting their aid package reconsidered at WashU? How long does it take to hear back after sending the form?
MrThickRopes
21:01
fo pm gon be good to us tmrw
Mr ropes is hopeful again so I am too
21:33
lets go ropes
21:53
[deleted by starfishies]
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.