Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Restraint on alienation

Read a random definition: standing vote

A quick definition of Restraint on alienation:

Restraint on alienation is a rule that says when someone owns a piece of land, they can't stop other people from owning it in the future. This means that if someone sells their land, they can't say that the new owner can never sell it again. This rule is important because it allows land to be bought and sold freely, which helps people use land in the best way possible. However, there are some cases where people try to put unreasonable restrictions on land, like saying that only certain types of people can own it. In those cases, the rule against restraint on alienation can be used to stop those restrictions from being enforced.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Restraint on alienation is a legal restriction that prevents the transfer of ownership of a property. This restriction can be indefinite or for a fixed period of time and is usually found in a deed or will.

However, courts generally do not like restraints on alienation because they limit the ability of future generations to own and use the property. Therefore, restraints on alienation are only upheld if they are not unreasonable.

For example, in the case of Shelby v. Kramer, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a provision in a conveyance that stated "only Caucasians may hold title" because it violated the Equal Protection Clause. This is an example of an unreasonable restraint on alienation.

Another example is the common law rule against perpetuities, which limits the time period for restricting the transfer of property title to lives in being, plus 21 years. This means that a property owner cannot restrict the transfer of ownership for an indefinite period of time.

In Gangemi v. Zoning Board of Appeals, the Supreme Court of Connecticut found that a condition of zoning variance that prohibited rental of homeowners' property in their beach district was an unreasonable restraint on alienation of homeowners' real property and invalidated it. This is another example of an unreasonable restraint on alienation.

Restraint of trade | Restriction

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
10:38
Very happy with LR other than having to guess on a couple questions cuz of time
10:42
i have a question about my personal statement. in my activism for the hospitality workers' union, i organized and spoke up in favor of stronger regulations on airbnb because the unregulated spread of airbnb throughout LA was inflating housing costs for workers and threatening their job security. do you think it's too divisive to mention regulating airbnb? idk
Nostradumbass
10:44
I wrote mine about how all activists should be consolidated into a large smelting pot and refined down to a viscous goo
Nostradumbass
10:45
Expecting a lot of rejections though
11:07
I'm sure you'll get a full ride to a few schools :P
11:11
The impression I get is most schools try not to judge based on the political implications of what you write about. They probably care more that you saw a problem and tried to fix it. That seems like a great thing to write a PS about @chowie
11:18
Besides, if a school didn’t let you in for trying to fix a problem you saw in your community, that doesn’t say great things about your school’s culture (assuming the thing you did showed good common sense judgment ofc)
11:19
That school’s* culture
11:23
Thanks Howl you're right :D I def talked about solving problems in my PS
12:03
@HowlEngineer: what's your dream school
MildChiller
12:08
"Have you applied for admission to [school] in a prior year" I applied in Oct. of the 23-24 cycle, should I put 23 or 24 as the year I applied?
MildChiller
12:09
Bcuz 2023 is when I technically applied but I applied for admissions in 2024
12:14
2024 cuz that's when you would've been admitted
I agree with Howl
12:19
Gecko what's ur dream school
Hard to say. I'm pretty firmly committed to the philly area so probably temple or villanova
Also relatively debt averse so I'd have to get a good scholarship from BC or Fordham to want to go but that's not very likely for me
Any advice? lol
[] baddestbunny
12:25
what’s a good scholarship for you? what would make BC or Fordham worth it?
12:25
Hmmmm let me think
[] baddestbunny
12:25
fordham’s max aid they give is 45k per year
Bunny I can possibly get a 75%+ scholarship from villanova or temple, and I'd be moving back in with my parents if I went there so I'd have near-zero COL. It'd be really hard to beat that
I would prefer BC over Fordham just because I like boston more, but I'm expecting a WL there tbh
I would maybe consider BC with $ but I don't know how to decide if a better biglaw chance is worth the COL + higher tuition
12:50
How do I know if my status checkers are properly linked
12:59
@ChowieBean: right now, Michigan, but there are several that come close. How about you?
13:05
@Law01: I haven't gotten the status checkers to work at all. When I sent an email to the LSData folks the other week, they said they were working on fixing them
13:10
but I think "Last Checked" would change from "Never" to something else
13:30
@HowlEngineer: I'll get more specific once I get my LSAT score, but NYU, Berk, GTown, UCLA
13:30
Anywhere that's top for PI
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.