Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Reynolds v. Sims (1964)

Read a random definition: tipstaff

A quick definition of Reynolds v. Sims (1964):

Reynolds v. Sims is a court case that said every person's vote should count the same in a state's legislature. This means that each district should have the same number of people, so each person's vote is equal. The case was brought by people in Alabama who said that the way their state counted votes was unfair because it was based on an old census. The court agreed that this was not fair and that everyone's vote should be equal.

A more thorough explanation:

Reynolds v. Sims is a Supreme Court case from 1964. It says that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that seats in a state legislature be divided up so that each person's vote counts the same. This means that each district should have the same number of people in it, so that each person's vote is worth the same amount.

For example, let's say that there are two districts in a state. District A has 10,000 people, and District B has 5,000 people. If each district gets one representative, then the people in District A have less voting power than the people in District B. This is because each representative in District A represents more people than each representative in District B. Reynolds v. Sims says that this is not fair, and that each district should have the same number of people in it.

In the Reynolds v. Sims case, people in Jefferson County, Alabama sued the state because they felt that the way the state divided up its districts was not fair. The state was using data from the 1900 census to divide up its districts, even though the population had changed a lot since then. The Supreme Court agreed with the people in Jefferson County, and said that the state needed to divide up its districts in a way that was fair to everyone.

rex non potest peccare | Rhadamanthine

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lawguy we're nearly stats twins :D
13:13
I saw that, and I saw you got the Georgetown interview invite yesterday too! Goodluck!
you too haha, i was super surprised to have received one so early not gonna lie
i heard the group interview is really chill and I'm kinda excited to do it
seems cool
13:14
Yeah, 7sage has a page that talks about the questions for each schools interview, GULC's seems unique
13:15
Idk how much of an effect it has on admissions chances but should be cool either way
ive heard the conversion rate for gulc group interview is pretty high even moreso if you have the stats
it's hard to say but i've also heard that the group interview is harder to get than the alumni interview. but who really knows tbh
im p sure they don't interview everyone and getting one this early should be a great sign!
13:16
Yeah I've heard the same ab the group interview
13:17
So maybe I'll see you in D.C. a year from now lmao
initiallaw
13:32
Speaking of stat twins kazuyamishima were exact stat twins lol
17:13
Anyone going to the UGA zoom thing on the 22nd?
17:16
My bad, 24th*
Idk, what's it for?
@Law-Guy: How'd you get the Vandy fee waiver?
17:32
What does going ur3 in 3 days mean at Uva 😅
that you will get UR2 in 3 more
17:33
somethings gotta give
I’m new. What’s the UR and UR2?
17:35
I already went ur2. It’s the 3rd status date change
17:35
@RustyWrangler: attend one of their virtual info sessions and they'll send you a fee waiver
@Law-Guy: Awesome, thanks! I'll sign up rn!
i'm not entirely sure
They've recently been sending a lot of interview invites
It means status change?
17:47
Someone said there is a wl/r wave coming but how can that even be predicted 😭
17:48
Where?
Quillinit
17:50
This is obviously not true for UVA. Past years show they don't send any non A results until December
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.