Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Right of way

Read a random definition: act of petition

A quick definition of Right of way:

Right of way: The right to go through someone else's property, like a path or road. Sometimes it's only for certain things, like fixing power lines or delivering things to a business. In traffic, it means who gets to go first. Drivers have to follow rules about when they have to let other drivers or pedestrians go first.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Right of way is the legal right to pass through or use someone else's property, usually granted through an easement. It can be a specific right with defined parameters or a general right to pass through, known as a floating easement. In traffic law, right of way refers to the right to proceed, and many state laws outline when drivers must yield the right of way to others.

Example 1: A homeowner grants their neighbor a right of way easement to use their driveway to access their own property.

Example 2: A utility company is granted a right of way easement to access power lines on private property.

Example 3: A driver approaches an intersection with a pedestrian crossing. The driver must yield the right of way to the pedestrian, allowing them to cross safely.

These examples illustrate the concept of right of way in different contexts. In the first two examples, a specific right of way is granted through an easement for a particular purpose. In the third example, right of way refers to the legal obligation of drivers to yield to pedestrians in certain situations.

Right of Survivorship | right to cancel (a contract)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.