Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

right to exclude

Read a random definition: bail emphytéotique

A quick definition of right to exclude:

The right to exclude is a term used in patents. It means that the person who owns the patent has the power to stop other people from making, using, selling, or offering for sale the invention that is protected by the patent. This means that only the patent owner has the right to use or profit from their invention.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The right to exclude refers to a patent holder's legal right to prevent others from making, using, selling, or offering for sale their invention.

Example: Let's say that John invents a new type of phone case that has a built-in charger. John applies for and receives a patent for his invention. With his patent, John has the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, or offering for sale his phone case with a built-in charger. This means that if someone else tries to make or sell a phone case with the same features as John's, he can take legal action to stop them.

Another example: Sarah invents a new type of solar panel that is more efficient than any other solar panel on the market. She applies for and receives a patent for her invention. With her patent, Sarah has the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, or offering for sale her solar panel. This means that if someone else tries to make or sell a solar panel with the same features as Sarah's, she can take legal action to stop them.

The examples illustrate how the right to exclude works in practice. Patents give inventors the exclusive right to their inventions, which means that they can control who can use or sell their invention. This helps to protect inventors' intellectual property and encourages innovation by giving inventors the opportunity to profit from their ideas.

right to die | right to family integrity

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.