Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

right to jury trial

Read a random definition: calumniate

A quick definition of right to jury trial:

Right to Jury Trial: The right to a jury trial means that in certain cases, a person accused of a crime or involved in a civil lawsuit has the right to have their case heard by a group of ordinary people called a jury. This right is protected by the Sixth and Seventh Amendments to the United States Constitution. However, there are some exceptions to this right, such as for minor crimes or in certain types of cases. In some situations, a person can choose to give up their right to a jury trial.

A more thorough explanation:

The right to a jury trial is a legal right provided by the Sixth and Seventh Amendments. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a trial by an impartial jury for all criminal prosecutions. The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial for suits in common law if the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars.

However, the Supreme Court has set legal precedent that excludes petty offenses from the guarantee to a jury trial in federal courts. The court has also made slight changes to certain phrases, such as with "criminal proceeding," to focus on the specific action that necessitates the inclusion of a jury. Additionally, the right to a jury trial is waivable in certain instances, but this differs depending on the jurisdiction.

On the federal level, the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial applies to civil cases. However, states are not required to guarantee civil trials under the Seventh Amendment, though most states have the right to a civil trial in specific cases to some degree in their state constitutions.

  • In a criminal case, the accused has the right to a trial by an impartial jury of the state and district in which the individual allegedly committed a crime. For example, if someone is accused of committing a crime in California, they have the right to a trial by a jury of their peers in California.
  • In a civil case, if the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars, the right to a jury trial is preserved. For example, if someone sues another person for damages exceeding twenty dollars, they have the right to a trial by a jury.

These examples illustrate how the right to a jury trial applies in both criminal and civil cases and how it is guaranteed by the Sixth and Seventh Amendments. They also show how the value in controversy is a determining factor in whether the right to a jury trial is preserved in civil cases.

Right to counsel | right to privacy

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.