Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

riparian-rights doctrine

Read a random definition: edictal intimation

A quick definition of riparian-rights doctrine:

The riparian-rights doctrine is a rule that says if you own land next to a river or stream, you have the right to use the water that flows through it. This means that all landowners who live along the waterway have equal rights to use the water. It is different from the prior-appropriation doctrine, which gives priority to the first person who uses the water for a beneficial purpose.

A more thorough explanation:

The riparian-rights doctrine is a rule that states that owners of land that borders a waterway have equal rights to use the water that passes through or by their property. This means that they have the right to use the water for things like drinking, irrigation, and recreation.

For example, if a person owns a piece of land that borders a river, they have the right to use the water from the river for their personal use. They can use it to water their crops, to drink, or to swim in. However, they cannot use the water in a way that would harm the rights of other riparian landowners.

Another example would be if a group of people own land that borders a lake. They all have the right to use the water from the lake for their personal use, but they must do so in a way that does not harm the rights of the other landowners.

The riparian-rights doctrine is different from the prior-appropriation doctrine, which gives priority to the first person to use the water for a beneficial purpose. Under the riparian-rights doctrine, all riparian landowners have equal rights to use the water.

riparian right | ripeness

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.