Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Royal Marriages Act

Read a random definition: Federal Insurance Contributions Act

A quick definition of Royal Marriages Act:

The Royal Marriages Act is a law from 1772 that says members of the royal family cannot get married without the permission of the king or queen. This law was made because King George III was worried that some members of the royal family might marry someone who was not suitable. The law says that if a royal family member wants to get married, they have to ask the king or queen first. If they are over 25 years old, they can also give 12 months' notice to the Privy Council. This law is still in place today.

A more thorough explanation:

The Royal Marriages Act is a law that was passed in 1772. It states that members of the royal family cannot get married without the permission of the king or queen. This law was created because King George III was worried that some members of the royal family might marry someone who was not suitable, which could damage the reputation of the royal family.

Under the Royal Marriages Act, if a member of the royal family wants to get married, they must get permission from the king or queen. If they are over 25 years old, they must also give 12 months' notice to the Privy Council. If the proposed marriage is not approved by both the king or queen and the Privy Council, it will not be considered valid.

For example, when Prince William, who is second in line to the throne, wanted to marry Kate Middleton, he had to get permission from his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II. The queen gave her permission, and the couple was able to get married.

Another example is when Princess Margaret, the younger sister of Queen Elizabeth II, wanted to marry a divorced man named Peter Townsend. Because the Royal Marriages Act did not allow members of the royal family to marry divorced people at that time, Princess Margaret had to choose between giving up her royal title and ending her relationship with Peter Townsend. She ultimately decided not to marry him.

routine-activities theory | royalty interest

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.