Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Rule 10b-5

Read a random definition: space charter

A quick definition of Rule 10b-5:

Rule 10b-5 is a law made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to stop people from lying or cheating when they buy or sell stocks. It says that it's illegal for anyone to trick or deceive others by lying about important information or leaving out important facts when they're buying or selling stocks. If someone breaks this law, they can be sued by people who were hurt by their lies or the SEC can punish them with criminal charges. To prove someone broke this law, the person suing or the SEC has to show that the liar knew they were lying and that the lies caused people to lose money.

A more thorough explanation:

Rule 10b-5 is a regulation created by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to prevent securities fraud. It prohibits anyone from using fraudulent schemes or making false statements in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.

The SEC created Rule 10b-5 under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, which gives the SEC the power to regulate securities fraud. The rule states that it is illegal for anyone to:

  • Use any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud
  • Make any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  • Engage in any act, practice, or course of business that would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person

Rule 10b-5 applies to both public offerings and private placements.

Courts have interpreted Rule 10b-5 to create a private civil cause of action, which means that individuals can sue for damages if they have been harmed by securities fraud. However, in order to have standing to bring a lawsuit under Rule 10b-5, the plaintiff must have actually purchased or sold a security. They cannot bring a lawsuit if they only claim that a fraudulent misrepresentation caused them to forego purchasing or selling a security.

To prove a violation of Rule 10b-5, a plaintiff or the SEC must prove the following elements:

  • The individual misrepresented a material fact
  • The individual did so knowingly (scienter)
  • The plaintiff relied on the individual's material misrepresentation
  • The plaintiff suffered a loss

If the SEC establishes these elements, the individual may be criminally liable.

Suppose a company's CEO knows that the company is about to go bankrupt but tells investors that the company is doing well and encourages them to buy stock. The CEO's statement is a material misrepresentation because it is false and would influence an investor's decision to buy stock. If an investor relies on the CEO's statement and buys stock, but later suffers a loss when the company goes bankrupt, they may have a cause of action under Rule 10b-5.

Rule | Rule 144A

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.