Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Rule 10b-5

Read a random definition: S/D B/L

A quick definition of Rule 10b-5:

Rule 10b-5 is a law made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to stop people from lying or cheating when they buy or sell stocks. It says that it's illegal for anyone to trick or deceive others by lying about important information or leaving out important facts when they're buying or selling stocks. If someone breaks this law, they can be sued by people who were hurt by their lies or the SEC can punish them with criminal charges. To prove someone broke this law, the person suing or the SEC has to show that the liar knew they were lying and that the lies caused people to lose money.

A more thorough explanation:

Rule 10b-5 is a regulation created by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to prevent securities fraud. It prohibits anyone from using fraudulent schemes or making false statements in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.

The SEC created Rule 10b-5 under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, which gives the SEC the power to regulate securities fraud. The rule states that it is illegal for anyone to:

  • Use any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud
  • Make any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  • Engage in any act, practice, or course of business that would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person

Rule 10b-5 applies to both public offerings and private placements.

Courts have interpreted Rule 10b-5 to create a private civil cause of action, which means that individuals can sue for damages if they have been harmed by securities fraud. However, in order to have standing to bring a lawsuit under Rule 10b-5, the plaintiff must have actually purchased or sold a security. They cannot bring a lawsuit if they only claim that a fraudulent misrepresentation caused them to forego purchasing or selling a security.

To prove a violation of Rule 10b-5, a plaintiff or the SEC must prove the following elements:

  • The individual misrepresented a material fact
  • The individual did so knowingly (scienter)
  • The plaintiff relied on the individual's material misrepresentation
  • The plaintiff suffered a loss

If the SEC establishes these elements, the individual may be criminally liable.

Suppose a company's CEO knows that the company is about to go bankrupt but tells investors that the company is doing well and encourages them to buy stock. The CEO's statement is a material misrepresentation because it is false and would influence an investor's decision to buy stock. If an investor relies on the CEO's statement and buys stock, but later suffers a loss when the company goes bankrupt, they may have a cause of action under Rule 10b-5.

Rule | Rule 144A

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.