Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

rule against accumulations

Read a random definition: psychotherapist–patient privilege

A quick definition of rule against accumulations:

The rule against accumulations is a legal rule that states that income from property can only be accumulated and distributed to certain beneficiaries within a certain period of time, known as the perpetuity period. This means that any direction to accumulate income beyond this period is not valid. This rule is related to the rule against perpetuities.

A more thorough explanation:

The rule against accumulations is a legal principle that states that any direction to accumulate income from property can only be valid if it is limited to the perpetuity period. This means that the income must be distributed to certain beneficiaries within a certain time frame.

For example, if a person leaves a will that directs their property to be held in trust for their grandchildren until they reach the age of 25, this direction would be valid under the rule against accumulations. However, if the will directed that the property be held in trust for the grandchildren for 50 years, this direction would be invalid because it exceeds the perpetuity period.

The rule against accumulations is closely related to the rule against perpetuities, which limits the time period during which property can be controlled by a trust or other legal instrument. Both rules are designed to prevent property from being tied up for too long and to ensure that it can be used for the benefit of future generations.

rule absolute | rule against inalienability

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.