Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Rule in Shelley's case

Read a random definition: comparuit ad diem

A quick definition of Rule in Shelley's case:

The Rule in Shelley's case is a law that applies to certain future interests. It says that if someone is given the right to use a property, they cannot pass that right on to their children or heirs. If the person who gave them the right tries to do this, the right will still belong to the original person and not their children.

A more thorough explanation:

The Rule in Shelley's case is a legal principle that applies to certain future interests. It prohibits the conveyance of a future interest to the heirs of the grantee who received the possessory estate. If the grantor tries to convey a future interest to the heirs of the grantee, the interest is considered to be to the grantee and not in the heirs of the grantee.

For example, if John grants land to Mary for life, with the remainder to Mary's heirs, the Rule in Shelley's case would apply. Mary's heirs would not receive the remainder interest because the interest would be considered to be in Mary and not in her heirs.

Another example would be if a father grants land to his son for life, with the remainder to the son's heirs. The Rule in Shelley's case would prevent the son's heirs from receiving the remainder interest because the interest would be considered to be in the son and not in his heirs.

These examples illustrate how the Rule in Shelley's case works by preventing the conveyance of future interests to the heirs of the grantee. Instead, the interest is considered to be in the grantee and not in their heirs.

Rule Against Perpetuities | Rule of Doubt

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
KS does negotiate! I got an email saying theyre doing it for the first time this year
its rather limited but its not nothing
17:18
@HopefullyInLawSchool: noted, thanks for the intel. I know we joke around but all things conidered, KS is goated
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.