Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

same-conduct test

Read a random definition: captive insurer

A quick definition of same-conduct test:

Term: Same-Conduct Test

Definition: The same-conduct test is a way to determine if a later charge against a person is allowed under the Double Jeopardy Clause. This test looks at whether the new charge requires the state to prove the same actions that were already proven in a previous trial for the same person. The Supreme Court used this test for a few years but then went back to using the Blockburger test.

A more thorough explanation:

The same-conduct test is a legal test used in criminal law to determine if a later charge arising from a single incident is barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause. This test analyzes whether the later charge requires the state to prove the same conduct that it was required to prove in a previous trial against the same defendant.

For example, if a person is charged with assault and battery for hitting someone with a baseball bat, and then later charged with attempted murder for the same incident, the same-conduct test would be used to determine if the attempted murder charge is barred by double jeopardy. If the state must prove the same conduct (hitting someone with a baseball bat) in both trials, then the attempted murder charge would be barred.

The Supreme Court adopted the same-conduct test in 1990 but later overruled that decision and revived the Blockburger test in 1993.

same-actor inference | same-elements test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
cumsock
13:00
careful! i graduated from reddit university
13:00
@texaslawhopefully: another day another missed wave??
lilypadfrog
13:01
what if I started using redditisms
lilypadfrog
13:01
thank you kind stranger for the gold
Trismegistus
13:01
do all my hopes and dreams and sanity rest on chicago now
texaslawhopefully
13:01
@sadpadresfan: prolly. My only hope is my last name is towards the end of the alphabet
lilypadfrog
13:01
i hope u guys would put me down like a dog that bit a baby
Trismegistus
13:02
@texaslawhopefully: i saw 3/4 down alphabet then 30- mins later 1/2 down alphabet
texaslawhopefully
13:02
so they're still calling?
Trismegistus
13:03
that i dont know
KeenHeartbreakingRattlesnake
13:03
the Penn e wave is about to cook me
atwatodbit
13:03
@sadpadresfan: did you get your Cornell scholly with your A at the same time? I think they gave me nothing...
lilypadfrog
13:04
tex also got cornell scholly ask him
texaslawhopefully
13:04
there's a form you fill out
texaslawhopefully
13:04
and they'll get back to you within a few days
13:04
@atwatodbit: they emailed me a day after submitting the form
atwatodbit
13:05
ah ok, i've seen that, just need to get parental info then. just making sure
13:05
Feeling fortunate and its my top choice as of now haha
lilypadfrog
13:06
what if you fill this out and you haven’t been admitted? just a next level move? they probably have to let you in then
PerpetualCheerfulBeaver
13:06
I applied to all my places in late september and am still waiting to hear back. ive missed all three types of waves (WL,R,A) am i screwed??
texaslawhopefully
13:07
Your guess is as good as mine. I'm in the same boat for most schools
Trismegistus
13:07
begging chicago for an A
atwatodbit
13:08
the vast majority of the t14 has not hit 50% of their As, many have not even hit 25%. zero reason for panic
PerpetualCheerfulBeaver
13:08
Thank you texas!
choosingpeace
13:08
missing CLS and Penn waves im so screwed
choosingpeace
13:08
i applied early too i hate everything im crashing out im crashing OUT
PerpetualCheerfulBeaver
13:08
I literally have no experience in this type of stuff, but if i get waitlisted, should i send an email about continued interest?
lilypadfrog
13:09
im so nonchalant
lilypadfrog
13:09
i will probably hear something back eventually
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.