Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

save-harmless clause

Read a random definition: laudare

A quick definition of save-harmless clause:

A save-harmless clause, also known as an indemnity clause, is a part of a contract where one party agrees to take responsibility for any harm or liability that the other party may face. This means that if something goes wrong, the party with the save-harmless clause will be responsible for fixing it or paying for any damages. It is similar to a hold-harmless clause and is different from an exemption clause.

A more thorough explanation:

A save-harmless clause, also known as an indemnity clause, is a provision in a contract where one party agrees to take responsibility for any harm or liability that the other party may face. This clause is often used to protect one party from financial loss or legal action resulting from the actions of the other party.

For example, a construction company may include a save-harmless clause in their contract with a client. This clause would state that the construction company will be responsible for any damages or injuries that occur on the job site, even if they are caused by the client or a third party. This protects the client from being held liable for any accidents that may occur during the construction process.

Another example of a save-harmless clause is in a rental agreement. The landlord may include a clause stating that they are not responsible for any injuries or damages that occur on the property, and that the tenant agrees to hold them harmless in the event of any legal action.

Overall, a save-harmless clause is a way for one party to shift the risk of liability to the other party. It is important to carefully review and understand any indemnity clauses in a contract before signing, as they can have significant financial and legal implications.

save-harmless agreement | saver default

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
eggan
10:32
im also doing fordham PI so its different
180letmein
10:32
Ahhh makes sense.
eggan
10:33
@winningest: top 10% isnt guaranteed tho. the curve might beat ur ass
eggan
10:34
between wayne and maurer tho for full rides id actually do maurer. indiana is a bigger name imo than wayne
eggan
10:35
you could probably get a cool job in chicago there
10:35
Between those two I lean Wayne bc I prefer location
eggan
10:35
gotcha its a location thing
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:36
me and my friends we got money to spend
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:36
me n my friends we got money to spend
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:36
me n my friends me n my friends
10:37
It seems so odd that lower ranked schools tend to region lock you though, it’s the only profession that really works like that I feel
10:38
That’s part of my fear is I don’t truly know where I’ll want to live in a decade
10:38
kjkj
10:45
what's up bullet shields?
Mostlylegal
10:46
ANOTHER DAY ANOTHER FO PM?
10:48
Heard maga SLS wave this week
Mostlylegal
10:50
guys i dont think i can take this anymore
10:50
So join a gang, esse
10:51
Everything is a choice, brudda
ClassyPleasantHeron
11:36
I'm honestly surprised that NYU has bothered to send more As this late.
MrThickRopes
11:38
Where da decisions at
11:40
^
babycakes
11:40
NYU has not rendered decisions for 50+% all applicants
babycakes
11:41
of all
babycakes
11:41
They are one of the law schools with the most acceptances left to give, along with Stanford
Denny
11:47
hi babtcakes
MeowPossibilities
12:03
guys how do i get lsat up to a 156 from 151 by june
TenFiftyILuvUGang
12:04
only need to get 4 or 5 more right
Mostlylegal
12:42
learn the question types and what the test writers want in the answers and you will score a 160
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.