Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

save-harmless clause

Read a random definition: agreed statement on appeal

A quick definition of save-harmless clause:

A save-harmless clause, also known as an indemnity clause, is a part of a contract where one party agrees to take responsibility for any harm or liability that the other party may face. This means that if something goes wrong, the party with the save-harmless clause will be responsible for fixing it or paying for any damages. It is similar to a hold-harmless clause and is different from an exemption clause.

A more thorough explanation:

A save-harmless clause, also known as an indemnity clause, is a provision in a contract where one party agrees to take responsibility for any harm or liability that the other party may face. This clause is often used to protect one party from financial loss or legal action resulting from the actions of the other party.

For example, a construction company may include a save-harmless clause in their contract with a client. This clause would state that the construction company will be responsible for any damages or injuries that occur on the job site, even if they are caused by the client or a third party. This protects the client from being held liable for any accidents that may occur during the construction process.

Another example of a save-harmless clause is in a rental agreement. The landlord may include a clause stating that they are not responsible for any injuries or damages that occur on the property, and that the tenant agrees to hold them harmless in the event of any legal action.

Overall, a save-harmless clause is a way for one party to shift the risk of liability to the other party. It is important to carefully review and understand any indemnity clauses in a contract before signing, as they can have significant financial and legal implications.

save-harmless agreement | saver default

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.