Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Secondary authority

Read a random definition: in clientela

A quick definition of Secondary authority:

Secondary authority refers to information about the law that comes from people who are not in charge of making the rules. This can include things like articles or books written by legal experts. While this information can be helpful, it is not required to be followed like primary authority, which comes directly from the government or courts.

A more thorough explanation:

Secondary authority

Secondary authority refers to statements about the law that come from unofficial commentators who do not have the authority to set legal rules in the relevant jurisdiction. Examples of secondary authority include law-review articles and treatises. While secondary authority may be persuasive, it is never mandatory.

Secondary authority is information about the law that comes from sources other than the law itself. This information can be helpful in understanding the law, but it is not legally binding. For example, a law-review article may provide an analysis of a court case, but it does not have the authority to change the law. Similarly, a treatise may provide an in-depth discussion of a legal topic, but it does not have the power to create new laws.

  • A law-review article that analyzes a recent court decision
  • A treatise on contract law that provides an in-depth discussion of the elements of a contract

These examples illustrate how secondary authority can be useful in understanding the law, but it is not legally binding. The law-review article provides an analysis of a court decision, but it does not have the power to change the law. The treatise provides an in-depth discussion of contract law, but it does not have the power to create new laws.

second degree murder | Secondary boycott

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.