Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

selecti judices

Read a random definition: ICPC

A quick definition of selecti judices:

Term: SELECTI JUDICES

Definition: Selecti judices were jurors in ancient Rome who were chosen by lot from a panel of potential jurors prepared by the praetor for a specific trial. They were sworn to office and subject to challenge, similar to modern juries.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Selecti judices (pronounced si-lek-tIjoo-di-seez) is a term from Roman law. It refers to jurors who were chosen from an official panel prepared by the praetor for a specific trial. These jurors were selected by lot, and they could be challenged. They were also sworn to office, just like modern juries.

For example, if someone was accused of a crime in ancient Rome, they would have a trial. The praetor would prepare a panel of potential jurors, and then a certain number of jurors would be selected by lot to serve on the jury. These jurors would be the selecti judices for that trial.

Another example might be a civil case in which two people were disputing a contract. The praetor would prepare a panel of potential jurors, and then a certain number of jurors would be selected by lot to serve on the jury. These jurors would be the selecti judices for that trial.

These examples illustrate how selecti judices were chosen for specific trials in ancient Rome. The jurors were not chosen by the parties involved in the trial, but rather by the praetor. This was meant to ensure that the jurors were impartial and unbiased. Once the jurors were selected, they were sworn to office and had to fulfill their duties as jurors for that trial.

select council | selective disclosure

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:16
^ gets it
lilypadfrog
14:16
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/cryptanon this is one of the guys who made the website
14:16
@lilypadfrog: wow more recent than i would have wagered
14:17
how is it so that I creep a rando and their app year is 2005-2005?
14:17
2005-2006* for example
renard99
14:18
^ find that rando in your circle and ask them where they've stored all their cycle letters
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Vandy??
renard99
14:18
Possibly in a dark corner of the attic in a box
VANDY
soyalmondoatmilk
14:18
vandy A let's gooooo
all the Vandy
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Aint no way
jackfrost11770
14:19
Wow that's awesome nothing from vandy
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
what
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
fuck
renard99
14:19
@soyalmondoatmilk: Congratulations!!!
jackfrost11770
14:19
I applied in November
jackfrost11770
14:19
Idk when the As did
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
does anyone know if they usually release all at once or waht
nothing
jackfrost11770
14:20
Well I hope not otherwise I'm screwed
jackfrost11770
14:21
Anderson cooper PLEASEEEEE
For ED and their last wave of decisions it was an email all at once
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:22
ugh
gonna go cry
jackfrost11770
14:22
Ugh
jackfrost11770
14:22
:(
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:23
Small ahh wave
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:23
yeah the smallness of this wave makes me think there might be more to come? am i being crazy? only one wave a month it should be a tsunami rn
14:24
@jackfrost11770: chillll it still early in the cycle, especially relative to this and last yearrrr
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.