Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

separate-sovereigns rule

Read a random definition: planned obsolescence

A quick definition of separate-sovereigns rule:

The separate-sovereigns rule is a legal principle that allows a person to be tried twice for the same crime if the prosecutions are conducted by different governments, such as the federal government and a state government or two different states. This means that even if someone has already been acquitted or convicted of a crime in one court, they can still be tried again in another court if the two courts are separate sovereigns.

A more thorough explanation:

The separate-sovereigns rule is a principle in criminal procedure that allows a person to be tried twice for the same offense, even though the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution prohibits it. This can happen if the prosecutions are conducted by separate sovereigns, such as the federal government and a state government or by two different states.

For example, if a person is charged with a crime in a state court and is acquitted, the federal government can still bring charges against that person for the same crime. This is because the state and federal governments are considered separate sovereigns, and therefore, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply.

Another example is if a person commits a crime in one state and then flees to another state. The person can be tried for the same crime in both states because they are separate sovereigns.

These examples illustrate how the separate-sovereigns rule allows for multiple prosecutions for the same offense by different governments, as long as they are considered separate sovereigns.

separate return | separate-spheres doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.