Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

sequestratio

Read a random definition: D'Oench Duhme doctrine

A quick definition of sequestratio:

Term: SEQUESTRATIO

Definition: Sequestratio means taking something away and keeping it separate from everything else. It's like putting a toy in a special box so that nobody can play with it. In legal terms, it means taking someone's property or money and holding it until a dispute is resolved or a debt is paid.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Sequestratio is a Latin term that refers to the legal process of seizing or confiscating property or assets by a court or government authority. This is usually done to ensure that the property or assets are used to pay off debts or to settle a legal dispute.

Example: If a person owes a large amount of money to a creditor and is unable to pay it back, the creditor may seek a court order for sequestratio of the person's assets. This means that the court will take possession of the person's property or assets and sell them to pay off the debt.

Another example: In some cases, a government may use sequestratio to take control of a company's assets if the company is found to be engaging in illegal activities or violating regulations. The government may then sell off the assets to recover any losses or damages caused by the company's actions.

These examples illustrate how sequestratio is used as a legal tool to ensure that debts are paid and justice is served. It is important to note that sequestratio is a serious legal action that should only be taken as a last resort.

sequestrate | sequestration for rent

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.