Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

servient estate

Read a random definition: offering

A quick definition of servient estate:

Servient estate is a piece of land that has to let someone else use it for a specific purpose. This is called an easement. The other piece of land that benefits from the easement is called the dominant estate. The owner of the servient estate has to make sure they don't interfere with the other person's right to use their land. The most common type of easement is for access, which means the servient estate has to let the dominant estate use their land to get to their own land. Servient estate can also be called servient property, servient tenement, or lower estate.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A servient estate is a piece of land that is subject to an easement, which benefits another piece of land. An easement is a right or privilege that the owner of one property (called the dominant estate) has over another property (called the servient estate). The owner of the servient estate is obligated not to interfere with that right or privilege.

For example, if a property owner has a driveway that crosses over a neighbor's property, the neighbor's property is the servient estate. The owner of the servient estate is not allowed to block the driveway or interfere with the owner's right to use it.

Another example is a utility company that has an easement to access a property to maintain power lines. The property owner cannot interfere with the utility company's right to access the property.

These examples illustrate how a servient estate is subject to an easement and must allow the dominant estate to exercise their right or privilege without interference.

Service of Process | servient tenement

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.