Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Sex trafficking

Read a random definition: qualificate

A quick definition of Sex trafficking:

Sex trafficking is when someone is forced or tricked into doing sexual things for money or other things of value. This is against the law and is a form of human trafficking. It can happen to both adults and children. If you or someone you know is being trafficked, you can call the national human trafficking hotline for help.

A more thorough explanation:

Sex trafficking is a type of human trafficking where people are forced or exploited to perform sexual acts. According to the U.S. Code, sex trafficking involves recruiting, harboring, transporting, providing, obtaining, patronizing, or soliciting a person for a commercial sex act. A commercial sex act is any sexual activity where something of value is given or received by any person.

For example, if someone is forced to have sex with others in exchange for money, that is considered sex trafficking. Similarly, if someone is lured into a situation where they are forced to perform sexual acts for others, that is also sex trafficking.

It is important to note that sex trafficking can happen to both adults and children. However, if an adult is trafficked for commercial sex acts, it is only considered sex trafficking if it is done through force, fraud, or coercion. On the other hand, if a child is trafficked for commercial sex acts, it is always considered sex trafficking, regardless of whether force, fraud, or coercion was used.

If you or someone you know is a victim of sex trafficking, there is a national human trafficking hotline that you can contact for help.

Sex offender | sexual harassment

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.