Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

sham action

Read a random definition: chiefry

A quick definition of sham action:

A sham action is when someone pretends to take legal action but doesn't actually do anything to resolve the problem. Legal action is when someone goes to court to try to solve a problem or dispute. A court is a place where judges make decisions about legal problems. A legal problem is when two people or groups disagree about something and need a judge to help them figure out what to do. A judge is a person who listens to both sides of a problem and makes a decision about what should happen.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A legal proceeding that is fake or fraudulent, brought without any intention of pursuing it to a conclusion. It is a deceptive tactic used to mislead the court or the opposing party.

Example: A person files a lawsuit against their neighbor for damages caused by a fallen tree. However, the person knows that the tree fell due to a storm and not because of any negligence on the neighbor's part. The lawsuit is a sham action because it has no merit and is brought solely to harass or intimidate the neighbor.

This example illustrates how a sham action can be used to abuse the legal system and waste the court's time and resources. It is considered unethical and can result in sanctions or penalties for the party who files it.

sham | sham affidavit

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.