Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Shifting executory interest

Read a random definition: registration-based quorum

A quick definition of Shifting executory interest:

Shifting executory interest: This is a type of future interest that comes after someone else has already had an interest in a property. It means that the ownership of the property will shift to someone else after a certain event or condition is met. For example, if a father gives his son a house but says that it will go to his daughter if she graduates from college, then the daughter has a shifting executory interest in the property. This means that if she graduates from college, she will become the owner of the house instead of her brother.

A more thorough explanation:

A shifting executory interest is a type of future interest that comes into effect after another grantee's interest has ended. This means that the interest "shifts" from one grantee to another.

Let's say that John grants a piece of land to Sarah for her lifetime, and then to Tom. In this case, Sarah has a life estate in the land, which means she can use it and enjoy it during her lifetime. However, when Sarah dies, her interest ends, and the land "shifts" to Tom, who then becomes the owner of the land.

Another example could be if John grants a piece of land to Sarah for 10 years, and then to Tom. In this case, Sarah has a term of years in the land, which means she can use it and enjoy it for 10 years. When her term ends, the land "shifts" to Tom, who then becomes the owner of the land.

These examples illustrate how a shifting executory interest works. It is a future interest that only comes into effect after another grantee's interest has ended.

Shield laws | shifting the burden of proof

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.