Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

simple-tool rule

Read a random definition: approved list

A quick definition of simple-tool rule:

Simple-Tool Rule: This means that if you are working with a tool and you know it is broken or dangerous, your employer does not have to warn you about it. It is your responsibility to make sure the tool is safe to use. Your employer also does not have to check the tool if it is only used by you and you know how to use it properly.

A more thorough explanation:

The simple-tool rule is a principle that states that an employer is not responsible for warning their employees about obvious dangers. Additionally, the employer is not required to inspect a tool that is under the complete control of an employee who is fully aware of the tool's condition.

For example, if an employee is using a hammer to drive a nail into a piece of wood, the employer does not need to warn the employee about the potential danger of hitting their finger with the hammer. This danger is obvious to anyone who has used a hammer before. Similarly, if the employee is using a saw that they have used many times before and are familiar with its condition, the employer does not need to inspect the saw.

Another example could be a construction worker who is using a ladder to reach a high place. If the ladder is in good condition and the worker has used it before, the employer does not need to inspect the ladder or warn the worker about the potential danger of falling.

The simple-tool rule is based on the assumption that employees are responsible for their own safety when using tools that they are familiar with. Employers are only responsible for providing safe tools and equipment and ensuring that employees are properly trained to use them.

simple state | simplex

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.