Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

simulated contract

Read a random definition: monetagium

A quick definition of simulated contract:

A simulated contract is an agreement between two or more parties that is not legally enforceable. It may look like a real contract, but it does not create any legal obligations or rights. In other words, it is just a pretend contract that has no legal effect.

A more thorough explanation:

A simulated contract is a type of contract that appears to be valid and enforceable, but in reality, it is not. It is a contract that is created to deceive or mislead others, and it has no legal effect.

For example, if two parties create a contract that is meant to deceive a third party, it is a simulated contract. The contract may look legitimate, but it is not legally binding.

Another example of a simulated contract is when a person signs a contract under duress or coercion. In this case, the contract is not valid because the person did not enter into the agreement willingly.

Simulated contracts are illegal and can result in legal consequences for those involved. It is important to ensure that any contract you enter into is legitimate and legally binding.

simpliciter | simulated fact

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:11
I read that as you sent them a pic of the baby for a second
kjds are getting crazier
texaslawhopefully
20:11
Sorry to interrupt this scintillating conversation but uchicago needs to release tmrw 😭
20:11
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
20:12
sorry
are we not going to get context on nick mullen sending nudes to your friend
lilypadfrog
20:13
he was sexting anyone back in the day and she’s cute
awww
New born baby brain is what you get when you can only sleep in small increments for days straight lol and if I sent them a picture of her I would of gotten a second A so she can attend full ride
Dkk
20:18
@lilypadfrog: lol desperate guy
Trismegistus
20:18
tex i need an A tomorrow from chicago
texaslawhopefully
20:18
Me and you both
texaslawhopefully
20:19
If I get an A from Chicago, I feel like my cycle will have turned out pretty great for my goals
texaslawhopefully
20:19
If I don’t, well…I’ll be back here next year rip
Wouldn't go to Cornell? Also, what's the competitiveness expectation for next cycle?
Trismegistus
20:22
i will be happier than a pig in shit man
texaslawhopefully
20:22
I want to clerk, and Cornell has a 5 percent clerk rate
texaslawhopefully
20:22
Fed clerk
texaslawhopefully
20:23
Chicago is at 25 percent. It’s just such a massive difference I don’t think it’s worth it to go elsewhere besides HYSC and maybe UVA
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.