Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

single-date-of-removal doctrine

Read a random definition: cognation

A quick definition of single-date-of-removal doctrine:

The single-date-of-removal doctrine is a rule in civil procedure that states that a case can only be removed from state court to federal court within 30 days from the day that any defendant receives a copy of the state-court pleading on which the removal is based. If a later-served defendant seeks to remove a case to federal court more than 30 days after the day any other defendant received the pleading, the removal is untimely. This doctrine is based on the idea that all defendants must agree to remove a case to federal court, and a defendant who has waited longer than 30 days to remove does not have the capacity to consent to removal.

A more thorough explanation:

The single-date-of-removal doctrine is a principle in civil procedure that sets a deadline for removing a case from state court to federal court. According to this doctrine, the deadline is 30 days from the day that any defendant receives a copy of the state-court pleading on which the removal is based.

For example, if a lawsuit is filed in state court and the defendant receives a copy of the complaint on January 1st, the deadline for removing the case to federal court is January 31st. If a later-served defendant seeks to remove the case to federal court more than 30 days after the day any other defendant received the pleading, the removal is untimely even if effectuated within 30 days after the removing defendant received the pleading.

The single-date-of-removal doctrine is based on the idea that all defendants must consent to remove a case to federal court. If a defendant has waited longer than 30 days to remove the case, they may not have the capacity to consent to removal.

The notice of removal is the pleading by which the defendant removes a case from state court to federal court. The notice must contain a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal and must include a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders that have been served on the removing party while the case has been pending.

For example, if a defendant wants to remove a case from state court to federal court, they must file a notice of removal in the federal district court in the district and division in which the suit is pending. The notice must be filed within 30 days after the defendant is served with process in the suit.

The removing party must also notify the state court and other parties to the suit that the notice of removal has been filed.

The single-date-of-removal doctrine and the notice of removal are important concepts in civil procedure that help ensure that cases are properly removed from state court to federal court in a timely and efficient manner.

single-criminal-intent doctrine | single-impulse plan

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Vandy gettin fat, that's what bandi did
Dont agree dkk but out of messages so this is a talk for another day
17:34
@LawIsForPeasants: I just want you to know that: you matter, you are important, and finally, I am proud of you. :D
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.