Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Small claims court

Read a random definition: Office of Initial Patent Examination

A quick definition of Small claims court:

A small claims court is a special court where people can go to resolve legal disputes that involve small amounts of money. These disputes usually involve less than $2,500 to $25,000, depending on the state. The rules in small claims court are not as strict as in regular court, and people often represent themselves. If someone wins their case in small claims court, they can get help enforcing the judgment against the other party.

A more thorough explanation:

A small-claims court is a type of state court that handles legal claims that fall below a certain amount, which varies by state but is generally between $2,500 and $25,000. These courts are designed to provide a quick and inexpensive way for people to resolve disputes without hiring a lawyer or going through a lengthy trial.

The rules of evidence in small-claims courts are usually more relaxed than in other courts, and litigants often represent themselves instead of hiring an attorney. This means that the process can be less formal and intimidating for people who are not familiar with the legal system.

Despite their informal nature, judgments made in small-claims court are legally binding and carry the same weight as those made in any other court. If a plaintiff wins their case, they are entitled to a variety of remedies to enforce the judgment, such as wage garnishment or property liens.

  • A tenant sues their landlord in small-claims court for failing to return their security deposit. The amount in dispute is $1,500, which is below the state's small-claims court threshold.
  • A small business owner sues a customer who has not paid their bill for services rendered. The amount in dispute is $3,000, which is within the state's small-claims court threshold.

These examples illustrate how small-claims court can be used to resolve disputes involving relatively small amounts of money. In both cases, the plaintiffs are seeking to recover money that they believe they are owed, but they are doing so without the need for a lawyer or a lengthy trial. Instead, they are using the streamlined process of small-claims court to seek a resolution to their dispute.

Slayer Rule | small entity

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.