Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Sole custody

Read a random definition: practice act

A quick definition of Sole custody:

Sole custody is when only one parent takes care of a child after their parents separate or divorce. This means that the child lives with one parent most of the time and the other parent only gets to visit. The parent who has sole custody also gets to make important decisions about the child's life without having to ask the other parent for permission.

A more thorough explanation:

Sole custody is a legal arrangement that happens when parents of a child separate or divorce. It means that only one parent has the right to make important decisions about the child's welfare, health, and upbringing. This parent is called the custodial parent and they have physical custody of the child, which means the child lives with them most or all of the time. The other parent, called the noncustodial parent, usually has visitation rights that are determined by the court.

  • A mother has sole custody of her child after a divorce. The father has visitation rights every other weekend.
  • A father has sole custody of his child because the mother is unable to care for the child due to drug addiction.

These examples illustrate how sole custody works. In the first example, the mother has physical custody of the child and the right to make important decisions about the child's life. The father has visitation rights, but he does not have the same level of control over the child's life as the mother. In the second example, the father has sole custody because the mother is unable to care for the child. This means that the father has the right to make all decisions about the child's life without consulting the mother.

Sodomy | Sole proprietor

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.