Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Sovereign immunity

Read a random definition: series code

A quick definition of Sovereign immunity:

Sovereign immunity means that the government cannot be sued without its permission. This comes from the idea that the King could do no wrong in British common law. In the United States, the federal and state governments have sovereign immunity, but not municipalities. However, the government can choose to waive its immunity. For example, the Federal Tort Claims Act waives federal immunity for certain types of claims. There are also rules about when citizens can sue the government or state actors.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Sovereign immunity is the principle that the government cannot be sued without its consent.

Overview: Sovereign immunity comes from British common law and means that the King could do no wrong. In the United States, sovereign immunity usually applies to the federal and state governments, but not to municipalities. However, the federal and state governments can choose to waive their sovereign immunity. For example, the Federal Tort Claims Act waives federal immunity for certain types of tort claims.

Examples: If a person is injured during their military service, they cannot sue the federal government because of the Feres Doctrine. Also, federal employees cannot be sued for torts committed during the scope of their employment because of the Westfall Act.

Citizens Suing Their Own State: When a citizen wants to sue a state actor (someone acting on behalf of the state), courts will typically use one of four tests to determine if the actor is subject to liability:

  1. Governmental v proprietary function test: If the actor was performing a proprietary function, then they are subject to liability. If the actor was performing a governmental function, then they are not subject to liability.
  2. Ministerial/operational v. discretionary functions/acts test: If the actor is performing a ministerial/operational action, then there is no immunity. If the actor is performing a discretionary action, then there is immunity.
  3. Planning v implementational: If the actor's planning of policy results in harm, then there is immunity. If the harm happens due to the government's implementation of the plan, then there is not immunity.
  4. Non-justiciable v. justiciable: If the action is justiciable under regular tort principles, then there is no immunity. If the issue is not justiciable under regular tort principles, then there is immunity.

Citizens Suing Other States: In the past, a citizen of one state could sue another state. However, the Eleventh Amendment now prevents this from happening.

Explanation: Sovereign immunity means that the government cannot be sued without its consent. This applies to both federal and state governments, but not to municipalities. However, the government can choose to waive its immunity. There are different tests to determine if a citizen can sue a state actor, and the Eleventh Amendment prevents citizens of one state from suing another state.

South Dakota | Sovereignty

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.