Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

feres doctrine

Read a random definition: FRB

A quick definition of feres doctrine:

The Feres Doctrine is a rule that says members of the military who are injured while on active duty cannot sue the government for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act. This rule was made by the U.S. Supreme Court in a case called Feres v. United States. The court gave three reasons for this rule: (1) the government cannot be sued like a regular person, (2) the relationship between the government and military is different from other relationships, and (3) military personnel who have already received benefits for their injuries cannot also sue for damages. However, there is now a limited exception to this rule for cases of medical malpractice by Department of Defense health care providers.

A more thorough explanation:

The Feres doctrine is a legal rule that prevents members of the armed forces from suing the federal government for injuries that occur while they are on active duty. This means that if a soldier is hurt or killed while serving, they cannot sue the government for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).

The Feres doctrine was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in a case called Feres v. United States. The court gave three reasons for the doctrine:

  1. The FTCA requires private liability, which is not present in military service.
  2. The relationship between the government and military personnel is "distinctively federal," and therefore not subject to local tort law.
  3. Military personnel who have already received veterans' benefits for their injuries cannot also sue for damages under the FTCA.

For many years, the Feres doctrine prevented soldiers from seeking compensation for injuries caused by medical malpractice in military hospitals. However, in 2020, the National Defense Authorization Act created an exception to the Feres doctrine for cases of medical malpractice in military medical treatment facilities.

For example, if a soldier is injured during combat and believes that the government was responsible for their injuries, they cannot sue for damages under the FTCA because of the Feres doctrine. However, if the soldier is injured due to medical malpractice in a military hospital, they may be able to sue for damages under the new exception to the Feres doctrine.

ferae naturae | fertile-octogenarian rule

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:14
Justice as Fairness!
16:14
also wow I didn’t consider that about immigration policy. hmmm
16:17
@Law-Guy: you get it
16:19
@baddestbunny: oh yeah definitly. Idk how any system of government would work if you can't distribute social goods to everyone.
MildChiller
16:33
does anyone know if the Yale webinars are cameras on?
1a2b3c4d26z
16:35
Justice as deez!
17:49
Quentin Tarantino is interested in watching somebody’s ear getting cut off; David Lynch is interested in the ear.
18:03
Quentin Tarantino can't resist putting a gay scene with a black guy participating in the gay act in his movies.
18:05
David Lynch is just gay.
18:18
Lynch is more in touch with his unconscious/dream state than the average person
18:42
Probably. I just dont know. All I know is he did a good job with Dune.
18:45
You should watch Blue Velvet
18:46
How’s your LSAT studying been going?
18:49
It is good. I have about two more weeks and I broke the 90 level on LSAT Demon which is good last night. My goal is 95 so I can probably get it before I test. It is scaled our of 100. This is for LR. My RC is below that but I know the more I get better at MBT questions the better my RC becomes.
18:50
I watched the trailer for that movie. The run time is 2 hours. May watch it on 2x the speed. Just watched se7en and thats like as graphic as I get so I kinda need a break from weird bodyhorror stuff. The sloth guy in that movie scared me.
18:51
I do like psychological horror though.
18:53
Oh jesus don’t watch the movie at all if you’re gonna watch it on 2x speed
18:54
I have never used lsat demon; how do their levels relate to actual lsat scoring?
18:56
kinda go in 20 point intervals. 20 points if you have mastered lvl 1 difficulty questions, 100 points if you have mastered lvl 5.
18:56
Getting 100 points is incredibly difficult though. anything baout 95 is pushing the 175-180 range. 90-95 is like 170-174 or so. etc.
18:56
yeah but if you’re getting a 95 on all sections what LSAT score is that? how is that calculated?
18:56
oh okay
18:57
so 100 would be a 180?
18:57
Yeah, 100 is like you would get a 180 and there's nothing more to teach you. I have only seen someone with a 100 like 2/3 times.
18:57
are you taking practice tests that are being scored though?
18:57
or just drills
18:57
Yep, they get factored into it.
18:58
I do drilling essentially every day. A timed section every 3, and a test every 2 weeks.
1a2b3c4d26z
20:06
re: WashU's URM lsat differential - fair to chalk that up to LSAT redaction weirdness messing w the scale or are they generally starved for URMs
1a2b3c4d26z
20:07
And an (albeit negligible) inverse URM GPA differential
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.