Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

special-facts rule

Read a random definition: affecting commerce

A quick definition of special-facts rule:

Special-Facts Rule: This is a rule that says if someone who is in charge of a company (like a director or officer) knows important information about the company, they have to tell someone who wants to buy or sell stock in the company if certain special circumstances apply. These special circumstances might be things like the person buying or selling the stock not knowing much about business, or the stock being hard to value. This rule is different from the "majority rule" that usually applies in these situations.

A more thorough explanation:

The special-facts rule is a principle in corporate law that requires directors or officers to disclose material inside information to shareholders when engaging in a stock transaction under special circumstances. This rule applies when the shareholder lacks business acumen, the shares are closely held with no readily ascertainable market value, or the director or officer instigated the transaction.

For example, if a director of a company knows that the company is about to release a new product that will significantly increase the value of the company's stock, and the director sells his or her shares before the announcement, the director must disclose this information to any shareholders who are buying the shares. This is because the director has inside information that the other shareholders do not have, and the director is using this information to gain an unfair advantage.

Another example of the special-facts rule is when a director or officer of a closely held company wants to sell his or her shares to a shareholder who lacks business acumen. In this case, the director or officer must disclose any material inside information that could affect the value of the shares, such as pending lawsuits or regulatory investigations.

The special-facts rule is an exception to the majority rule, which states that directors and officers have no duty to disclose inside information to shareholders. The special-facts rule recognizes that in certain circumstances, shareholders may be at a disadvantage and need extra protection.

special executor | special finding

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Vandy gettin fat, that's what bandi did
Dont agree dkk but out of messages so this is a talk for another day
17:34
@LawIsForPeasants: I just want you to know that: you matter, you are important, and finally, I am proud of you. :D
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.