Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

special-sensitivity rule

Read a random definition: manager

A quick definition of special-sensitivity rule:

The special-sensitivity rule, also known as the eggshell-skull rule, is a principle in tort law that holds a defendant responsible for the unforeseeable and uncommon reactions of a plaintiff to their negligent or intentional act. This means that if someone is injured due to the defendant's actions, even if the injury is more severe than expected because of the plaintiff's unique physical or mental condition, the defendant is still liable for the full extent of the harm caused. For example, if someone accidentally bumps into a person with a rare medical condition, causing serious injury, they are still responsible for the full extent of the harm caused, even though the injury may have been minor for someone without that condition.

A more thorough explanation:

The special-sensitivity rule, also known as the eggshell-skull rule, is a principle in tort law that holds a defendant responsible for a plaintiff's unforeseeable and uncommon reactions to the defendant's negligent or intentional act.

For example, if someone negligently bumps into another person who happens to be a hemophiliac, the negligent person is liable for the full extent of the hemophiliac's injuries, even though the harm to another person would have been minor. This is because the hemophiliac's condition was unforeseeable and uncommon, and the negligent person must take the plaintiff as they find them.

Another example could be if someone negligently causes a car accident and one of the passengers happens to have a pre-existing medical condition that is aggravated by the accident. The negligent person would be responsible for the full extent of the passenger's injuries, even if the injuries would have been less severe for someone without the pre-existing condition.

The special-sensitivity rule ensures that defendants are held accountable for the harm they cause, even if the harm is greater than what would be expected for an average person. It also encourages defendants to take extra care when interacting with others, as they cannot predict who may have a special sensitivity or pre-existing condition.

special rule | special session

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Morning
10:37
Gecko, I feel pretty good. Two of the RC passages had really tough inference questions -- hoping I narrowed down my answer choices correctly
10:38
Very happy with LR other than having to guess on a couple questions cuz of time
10:42
i have a question about my personal statement. in my activism for the hospitality workers' union, i organized and spoke up in favor of stronger regulations on airbnb because the unregulated spread of airbnb throughout LA was inflating housing costs for workers and threatening their job security. do you think it's too divisive to mention regulating airbnb? idk
Nostradumbass
10:44
I wrote mine about how all activists should be consolidated into a large smelting pot and refined down to a viscous goo
Nostradumbass
10:45
Expecting a lot of rejections though
11:07
I'm sure you'll get a full ride to a few schools :P
11:11
The impression I get is most schools try not to judge based on the political implications of what you write about. They probably care more that you saw a problem and tried to fix it. That seems like a great thing to write a PS about @chowie
11:18
Besides, if a school didn’t let you in for trying to fix a problem you saw in your community, that doesn’t say great things about your school’s culture (assuming the thing you did showed good common sense judgment ofc)
11:19
That school’s* culture
11:23
Thanks Howl you're right :D I def talked about solving problems in my PS
12:03
@HowlEngineer: what's your dream school
MildChiller
12:08
"Have you applied for admission to [school] in a prior year" I applied in Oct. of the 23-24 cycle, should I put 23 or 24 as the year I applied?
MildChiller
12:09
Bcuz 2023 is when I technically applied but I applied for admissions in 2024
12:14
2024 cuz that's when you would've been admitted
I agree with Howl
12:19
Gecko what's ur dream school
Hard to say. I'm pretty firmly committed to the philly area so probably temple or villanova
Also relatively debt averse so I'd have to get a good scholarship from BC or Fordham to want to go but that's not very likely for me
Any advice? lol
[] baddestbunny
12:25
what’s a good scholarship for you? what would make BC or Fordham worth it?
12:25
Hmmmm let me think
[] baddestbunny
12:25
fordham’s max aid they give is 45k per year
Bunny I can possibly get a 75%+ scholarship from villanova or temple, and I'd be moving back in with my parents if I went there so I'd have near-zero COL. It'd be really hard to beat that
I would prefer BC over Fordham just because I like boston more, but I'm expecting a WL there tbh
I would maybe consider BC with $ but I don't know how to decide if a better biglaw chance is worth the COL + higher tuition
12:50
How do I know if my status checkers are properly linked
12:59
@ChowieBean: right now, Michigan, but there are several that come close. How about you?
13:05
@Law01: I haven't gotten the status checkers to work at all. When I sent an email to the LSData folks the other week, they said they were working on fixing them
13:10
but I think "Last Checked" would change from "Never" to something else
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.