Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

spillover theory

Read a random definition: statement of utility

A quick definition of spillover theory:

Spillover theory: This is a rule that says a person can only be punished if they did something wrong, not just because they were with someone who did something wrong. If two people are accused of a crime together, and one person's evidence might make the other person look bad, the judge has to decide if it's fair to have a trial together or if they should have separate trials. The judge will make sure that the jury can tell who did what and not blame someone just because they were with the other person.

A more thorough explanation:

The spillover theory is a principle in criminal law that states that a defendant can only be granted a separate trial if they can prove that being tried with a co-defendant would unfairly prejudice their case. This can happen when evidence that is admissible against one defendant is also used against the other defendant, even if it is not relevant to their case.

For example, if two people are accused of robbing a bank together, and one of them made a confession that implicates both of them, the confession could unfairly influence the jury's decision against the other defendant. In this case, the defendant could argue for a separate trial to avoid being unfairly prejudiced by the confession.

The spillover theory is based on the idea that a jury's unfavorable impression of one defendant could influence their view of the other defendant, even if the evidence is not relevant to their case. The goal is to ensure that each defendant receives a fair and impartial trial, without being unfairly influenced by evidence that is not relevant to their case.

spillover | spin-off

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.